Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b162/7b162df3ec790c8fdeb836e01efa7053559c47f1" alt="Olympus FE-4000 front Olympus FE-4000 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-925
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus FE-4000, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the FE-4000 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FE-4000 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-520 was released 11 months before the FE-4000 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus FE-4000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-520 grades vs the FE-4000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Olympus FE-4000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus FE-4000
E-520 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Olympus E-520
FE-4000 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus FE-4000
E-520 | FE-4000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4000 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus FE-4000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 versus the FE-4000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3cf6/a3cf61d6c11c527e1e91d1f94a21fa152b1928f1" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and FE-4000 is 68 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43367/4336780a8d6baa94b718df985efa61dac7bcaa0c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing specifications. The graphic here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and FE-4000.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus FE-4000 will render more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bff16/bff1616dd28e4b632a8b647a3931a2482856f51d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b615/0b615f6b8575521cc04ef9dde672168eb2d2bbf1" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus FE-4000 |
Otherwise known as | - | X-925 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.6-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 136 gr (0.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $130 |