Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched July 2009
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P2
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the E-P1 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-520 was released 11 months prior to the E-P1 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-520 matches up versus the E-P1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Olympus PEN E-P1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus E-P1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-P1
| E-520 | E-P1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus E-520
| E-P1 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 | August 2008 | More recent by 11 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-P1
| E-520 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 enjoys physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus E-P1 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-520 compared to the E-P1.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and E-P1 is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and E-P1.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus E-P1 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-P1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-P1 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2009-07-29 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | 536 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $400 | $182 |