Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched July 2009
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P2
Photography Glossary Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the E-P1 (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-520 was released 11 months prior to the E-P1 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-520 matches up versus the E-P1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Olympus PEN E-P1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus E-P1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-P1
| E-520 | E-P1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus E-520
| E-P1 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2009 | August 2008 | More recent by 11 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-P1
| E-520 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 enjoys physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus E-P1 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-520 compared to the E-P1.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and E-P1 is 68 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by checking specifications. The visual underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and E-P1.
Plainly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus E-P1 to resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-P1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-P1 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2009-07-29 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | 55 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 21.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | 536 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $400 | $182 |