Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus E-PL9, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-520 was released 10 years prior to the E-PL9 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-520 matches up versus the E-PL9 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-PL9
E-520 | E-PL9 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus E-520
E-PL9 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 115 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-PL9
E-520 | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has got physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL9 has measurements of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus E-PL9 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-520 and the E-PL9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54f3f/54f3f177323a66eb9b396b27da8e94c8229af77d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and E-PL9 is 68 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f98b1/f98b12c042d0aadabbe4dd4b0de0cc86fa9ec670" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and E-PL9.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus E-PL9 to give greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5950/d59500f3791c884738df957c22f3668160d5a5f4" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d536d/d536d97c7fcabf88510e0d7f1811b8c25fdbba72" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) | 380 gr (0.84 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $400 | $599 |