Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus E-PM2, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was unveiled 5 years prior to the E-PM2 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-520 scores vs the E-PM2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 and Olympus PEN E-PM2. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus E-PM2
E-520 | E-PM2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Olympus E-520
E-PM2 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 57 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus E-PM2
E-520 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM2 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus E-PM2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-520 vs the E-PM2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25303/2530302f718e4b395691f27546b6c98d70df16f0" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and E-PM2 is 68 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16c71/16c717fac8627c092c9ad6d9a25c21127c1bb0f5" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and E-PM2.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus E-PM2 to give you more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8661a/8661aaa5aedb8adf39824ca167fb16d6ba98d22e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13a25/13a250e5aa98252377c1bca2212e39057c93270d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 360 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $400 | $448 |