Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a542/5a54204eab4a88c3bca57f82f94873880adeaa4d" alt="Olympus SP-600 UZ front Olympus SP-600 UZ front"
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Released February 2010
- Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the SP-600 UZ (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-520 was brought out 17 months prior to the SP-600 UZ which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-520 grades against the SP-600 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 and Olympus SP-600 UZ. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-520 | SP-600 UZ |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-520
SP-600 UZ | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | ![]() | August 2008 | Newer by 17 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-520 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 and the SP-600 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/071d0/071d020861c947eec76aaac28000249437292752" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and SP-600 UZ is 68 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c046/8c04624da2ab875906237e35b4fe1d75628cb434" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The image underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and SP-600 UZ.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-600 UZ will give more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df03c/df03c834b6bf686b3f984d756ce8a4f34ec39948" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec0e6/ec0e65fbd725aed86524e8bb54b0105ff86c325a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lb) | 455 grams (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $400 | $189 |