Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus SP-600 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
35
Features
27
Overall
31

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-510
Olympus SP-600 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus SP-590 UZ
  • Successor is Olympus SP-610UZ
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the SP-600 UZ (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-520 was brought out 17 months prior to the SP-600 UZ which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-520 grades against the SP-600 UZ in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ

 E-520 SP-600 UZ 

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-520

 SP-600 UZ E-520 
ReleasedFebruary 2010August 2008Newer by 17 months

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SP-600 UZ

 E-520 SP-600 UZ 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen measurements
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus SP-600 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

See the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-520 and the SP-600 UZ.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and SP-600 UZ is 68 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The image underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and SP-600 UZ.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-600 UZ will give more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SP-600 UZ Portrait photography highlights
59
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
27
manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography features
Olympus SP-600 UZ Street photography features
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
36
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SP-600 UZ as a Sports photography camera
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
supports phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 fps)
low megapixels (10MP)
31
incredible zoom range (28-420mm 15.0 x zoom)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography information
Olympus SP-600 UZ Travel photography information
52
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
51
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
great zoom (420mm)
missing Timelapse recording
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-600 UZ Landscape photography factors
58
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
screen is small (2.7")
low megapixels (10MP)
no Time Lapse recording
29
manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
manual mode not possible
lack of image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging information
Olympus SP-600 UZ Vlogging information
9
can't record video
20
pretty wide (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone socket
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
 Olympus E-520Olympus SP-600 UZ
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-520 Olympus SP-600 UZ
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2008-08-20 2010-02-02
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 143
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-420mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.4
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 1/2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.10 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552 grams (1.22 lb) 455 grams (1.00 lb)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $400 $189