Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-2 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Released August 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-510
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released March 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
  • New Model is Olympus SH-3
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview

Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-520 was brought out 7 years before the SH-2 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-520 grades vs the SH-2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus SH-2

 E-520 SH-2 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-520

 SH-2 E-520 
ReleasedMarch 2015August 2008Fresher by 79 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SH-2

 E-520 SH-2 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 offers physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

See the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-520 versus the SH-2.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and SH-2 is 68 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and SH-2.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus SH-2 will give greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography details
Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography details
59
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
44
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography info
Olympus SH-2 Street photography info
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
70
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
supports focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (271g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SH-2 as a Sports photography camera
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
better than average battery power (650 shots)
has phase detect auto focus
max fps very slow (4.0 frames/s)
MP count low (10MP)
51
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography advice
52
better than average battery power (650 CIPA)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
74
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
supports focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography advice
Olympus SH-2 Landscape photography advice
58
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (650 per charge)
tiny screen (2.7")
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse function
55
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
better than average battery life (380 shots)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging features
Olympus SH-2 Vlogging features
9
lack of video recording
35
rather wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus SH-2
 Olympus E-520Olympus Stylus SH-2
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-520 Olympus Stylus SH-2
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2008-08-20 2015-03-11
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per sec 11.5 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552g (1.22 lb) 271g (0.60 lb)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures 380 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID - LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $400 $399