Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Released March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- New Model is Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-520 was brought out 7 years before the SH-2 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-520 grades vs the SH-2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus SH-2
E-520 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-520
SH-2 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2015 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 79 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SH-2
E-520 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 offers physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has specifications of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-520 versus the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbd8a/bbd8a705312ac2794e3fa5a98d61fc0f7a1cac6e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and SH-2 is 68 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7831/c7831a9edd878bf3d7d295bdca0d9d3723a43610" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and SH-2.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus SH-2 will give greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85daa/85daa7b878ce02a2da549d301ee11abcab545e3b" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90431/904317a650c1b31190b990057cc79318c65587a2" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2008-08-20 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 11.5 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 380 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $400 | $399 |