Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba681/ba6812b6e5df39af8b55dc812608daf65a0563e5" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-3 front Olympus Stylus SH-3 front"
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Old Model is Olympus SH-2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus SH-3, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-520 was introduced 8 years prior to the SH-3 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-520 grades vs the SH-3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Olympus Stylus SH-3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus SH-3
E-520 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-520
SH-3 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 90 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SH-3
E-520 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 features external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus SH-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-520 versus the SH-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d128/2d12864b1517fca12b1d7dc2bcb467120b228cbd" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and SH-3 is 68 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29192/29192869044834cb39762373521d72fe464d4f4a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and SH-3.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-520 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-3 will resolve more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d652/3d652b331012edb86f698cdb1f9726ee693b10c3" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ada32/ada32bda0a0822d9f62c27a944a78482b0d9a195" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2016-02-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 271 gr (0.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 380 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $400 | $579 |