Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus Stylus SH-3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Olympus SH-3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus SH-2
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus SH-3, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SH-3 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-520 was introduced 8 years prior to the SH-3 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-520 grades vs the SH-3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus SH-3

 E-520 SH-3 
Focus manually More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus E-520

 SH-3 E-520 
LaunchedFebruary 2016August 2008More modern by 90 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus SH-3

 E-520 SH-3 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 features external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus SH-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-520 versus the SH-3.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and SH-3 is 68 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The pic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and SH-3.

As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-520 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-3 will resolve more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-3
59
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
44
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detect focus
delivers RAW files
lack of manual focus
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography highlights
Olympus SH-3 Street photography highlights
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
70
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
supports focus via touch
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography factors
Olympus SH-3 Sports photography factors
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good battery (650 shots)
supports phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
51
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
good battery life (380 shots)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus SH-3 as a Travel photography camera
52
good battery (650 CIPA)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
74
good battery life (380 CIPA)
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
supports focus via touch
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-3
58
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
good battery (650 CIPA)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse mode
55
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (380 shots)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging information
Olympus SH-3 Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
35
reasonably wide (25mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (271g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus SH-3
 Olympus E-520Olympus Stylus SH-3
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-520 Olympus Stylus SH-3
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2008-08-20 2016-02-08
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 11.5 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.30 m (at ISO 3200)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video file format - H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552 gr (1.22 lb) 271 gr (0.60 lb)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 shots 380 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $400 $579