Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus 8000, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the 8000 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was manufactured 10 months earlier than the 8000 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-520 matches up vs the 8000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus 8000
E-520 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-520
8000 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2009 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 10 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus 8000
E-520 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 enjoys outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus 8000 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus 8000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-520 compared to the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea1f8/ea1f8c04083082fc8f86ba1e759e40eb6ef605d0" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and 8000 is 68 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04744/04744ad17a77279377d63a02635ae19092443e26" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking specifications. The graphic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and 8000.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus 8000 will give you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77a57/77a573b79c8ba5c88a6fc38282e64b5d6d6546f6" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d768/6d7682427c4947f449f029475ff59079e618166e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 8000 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2009-07-01 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $400 | $380 |