Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus TG-860, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-520 was revealed 7 years earlier than the TG-860 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-520 matches up against the TG-860 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-860
E-520 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-520
TG-860 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 78 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-860
E-520 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-520 versus the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56927/569279d8a1edd431840aaf328ba471aa63e0c72d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and TG-860 is 68 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a620c/a620c904708304648a0541b7bff5f13e3f62a826" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and TG-860.
As you can see, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-860 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92cbc/92cbc7a093adf1e26f834f9b94945d19061cf94f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c22b/6c22bb1ca5a21e3dfb477a069415cf9c1577c9ed" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 300 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $400 | $279 |