Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-520 was introduced 8 years prior to the TG-870 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-520 scores vs the TG-870 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-870
E-520 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-520
TG-870 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | August 2008 | More recent by 89 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-870
E-520 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 offers physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-520 compared to the TG-870.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and TG-870 is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The visual underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and TG-870.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-520 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-870 will give you greater detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 221g (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 300 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $400 | $280 |