Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the TG-630 iHS (12MP) is fairly close but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was brought out 5 years prior to the TG-630 iHS which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-520 scores against the TG-630 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-520 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-520
TG-630 iHS | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2008 | Newer by 53 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-520 | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 enjoys outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has proportions of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-630 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-520 and the TG-630 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1111/c1111eeda56bbf33638f8fe66bf7524770ebb3ee" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and TG-630 iHS is 68 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09dfd/09dfd4dd75f3d63886818f897edb01d6e7458b8e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and TG-630 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-630 iHS will provide you with more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7439c/7439c27a2ba8e2b2a0eb692710e31216db884e8a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35ae5/35ae58f5b59f5d5f40670e55fd054efabae03d69" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Released | 2008-08-20 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 167g (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 220 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $200 |