Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-520 was revealed 4 years before the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-520 scores against the TG-820 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| E-520 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-520
| TG-820 iHS | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 | August 2008 | More modern by 42 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| E-520 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 offers exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-520 vs the TG-820 iHS.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and TG-820 iHS is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The pic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and TG-820 iHS.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-520 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will show more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,030k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $500 |