Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Revealed February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

Following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-520 was revealed 4 years before the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-520 scores against the TG-820 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-520 TG-820 iHS 
Manually focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-520

 TG-820 iHS E-520 
RevealedFebruary 2012August 2008More modern by 42 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1030k230kClearer display (+800k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-520 TG-820 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 offers exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-520 vs the TG-820 iHS.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and TG-820 iHS is 68 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specifications. The pic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and TG-820 iHS.

To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-520 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will show more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography details
59
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
low resolution (10MP)
27
comes with face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography highlights
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography advice
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
great battery life (650 per charge)
supports phase detect auto focus
low frames per second (4.0 fps)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proof
low fps (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
52
great battery life (650 shots)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
59
weather proof
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
not so great battery power (220 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography details
58
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
great battery life (650 per charge)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse function
38
rather wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
not so great battery power (220 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging information
9
can't shoot video
33
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Olympus E-520Olympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-520 Olympus TG-820 iHS
Class Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Launched 2008-08-20 2012-02-08
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,030k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 4.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552 grams (1.22 lb) 206 grams (0.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 photographs 220 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $400 $500