Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Updated by Olympus TG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-5, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the TG-5 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 9 years earlier than the TG-5 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-520 grades vs the TG-5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Olympus Tough TG-5. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus TG-5
E-520 | TG-5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-520
TG-5 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | August 2008 | Newer by 106 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-5
E-520 | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 offers physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has specifications of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 and Olympus TG-5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-520 against the TG-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4133/c4133e30d8c958f6031351ab81ec98f414b2c125" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and TG-5 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90daa/90daacc634dc9b6b737382a9233909c4c7cfa200" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and TG-5.
All in all, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 having a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-5 will offer greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cd35/5cd35a838cb7a324ea36cfc5f61955b342c16bb8" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b533a/b533a5e398fddb52a2845b6b2f1e76bd5e7f5fe7" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2017-05-17 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 20.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 250g (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 340 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $400 | $449 |