Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-110
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-520 and Olympus VG-110, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is very similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-520 was manufactured 3 years prior to the VG-110 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-520 matches up against the VG-110 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Olympus VG-110. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus VG-110
| E-520 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-520
| VG-110 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 |  | August 2008 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus VG-110
| E-520 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 provides exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has dimensions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 and Olympus VG-110 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-520 against the VG-110.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and VG-110 is 68 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and VG-110.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-520 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VG-110 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Olympus VG-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus VG-110 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2008-08-20 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 105g (0.23 lb) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photos | 170 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $400 | $150 |