Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and VH-410 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and VH-410 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 5 years prior to the VH-410 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-520 scores vs the VH-410 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus VH-410
E-520 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus E-520
VH-410 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 48 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus VH-410
E-520 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 enjoys physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus VH-410 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-520 and the VH-410.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89991/89991b94d6b3a46494fc025063f0cadb727a59cb" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and VH-410 is 68 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b82c/7b82cb2250daf47ba2905be901624849410b2771" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through specs. The visual underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and VH-410.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-520 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VH-410 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77ee5/77ee559caf8b45a325cb6113ee65ada4414c2ddf" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f1cf/1f1cf46d01130d9baaf609adea093f459498aa06" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus VH-410 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $400 | $186 |