Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Older Model is Olympus E-510
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus VR-320
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and VR-330 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-520 was released 3 years before the VR-330 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-520 scores vs the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-520 VR-330 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-520

 VR-330 E-520 
RevealedFebruary 2011August 2008Fresher by 30 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus VR-330

 E-520 VR-330 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-520 and the VR-330.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and VR-330 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and VR-330.

All in all, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus VR-330 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography information
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography information
59
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (10MP)
33
good resolution (14MP)
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography features
Olympus VR-330 Street photography features
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Sports photography camera
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great battery (650 CIPA)
has phase detect AF
slow fps (4.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
52
great battery (650 shots)
built-in flash
no Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than competition in class (158g)
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography highlights
58
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
great battery (650 per charge)
small screen (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
no Timelapse function
42
decently wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't record video
32
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus E-520Olympus VR-330
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-520 Olympus VR-330
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2008-08-20 2011-02-08
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 gr (1.22 lbs) 158 gr (0.35 lbs)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $400 $220