Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus VR-340, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-520 was revealed 4 years before the VR-340 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-520 scores vs the VR-340 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Olympus VR-340. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus VR-340
E-520 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-520
VR-340 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 41 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus VR-340
E-520 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 enjoys physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus VR-340 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-520 and the VR-340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52940/52940c3139c78688afac4ba51771d51031e4757f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and VR-340 is 68 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55e5c/55e5c1b3cf450b7bb08215ef2c9d6925f46f7a1a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The image here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and VR-340.
As you can plainly see, both cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-520 using its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus VR-340 will show extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65468/654681a8bdf22a816a0d677452069d8a1b567fce" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fed6/9fed63ac2406c12e3c4a158b827695618c32f325" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Olympus VR-340 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $400 | $130 |