Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-1
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Released January 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the XZ-1 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-520 was announced 3 years before the XZ-1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-520 scores against the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Olympus XZ-1
| E-520 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-520
| XZ-1 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | August 2008 | Fresher by 29 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Olympus XZ-1
| E-520 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 comes with outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-520 vs the XZ-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and XZ-1 is 68 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The photograph below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and XZ-1.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-520 contains the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF easier. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-520 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photos | 320 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $567 |
