Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b169f/b169f2b717cb8d5ef4499816cf19dad2fd0b1dbd" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 3 years before the FH25 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-520 matches up vs the FH25 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FH25
E-520 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-520
FH25 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 28 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FH25
E-520 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Panasonic FH25 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-520 against the FH25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95582/95582cebbd00d133738ef2a4ab67e9583a72db3a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and FH25 is 68 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6b42/d6b4236d6d90a3620ef9c2f8c6317fe704e70a01" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through specifications. The picture below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and FH25.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-520 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FH25 will give more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d5dc/3d5dc2688a95a235ea9cea9e66a83706e85b797f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4facf/4facf35f1fd72133c9aad1efe90ae183558742b1" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2008-08-20 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 159g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | 250 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $400 | $180 |