Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98111/98111a0b7c2ad20df355c7415ff9f3db6009ee5f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Announced January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic FH3, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FH3 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FH3 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-520 was brought out 16 months prior to the FH3 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH3 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-520 scores vs the FH3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FH3
E-520 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus E-520
FH3 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2010 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 16 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FH3
E-520 | FH3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 offers outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH3 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic FH3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-520 compared to the FH3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81f88/81f88abe38c315a31b082ad03a006333a43b1050" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and FH3 is 68 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9434c/9434cdbea53bbac8e0e9cc8e57255a9aa5c3f041" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and FH3.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic FH3 will give you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e56c/6e56cd3d30e4d98aa509c4c58b4beed2fdc2067e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/254fe/254fea4f5a366c10ed633a193cff195ac5a358be" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2008-08-20 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 165g (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $400 | $160 |