Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4947f/4947fb87fbec47ca46c132a07069d33ec1864a0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 front"
96 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FS18
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FH5 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FH5 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-520 was released 3 years prior to the FH5 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH5 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-520 grades against the FH5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Panasonic FH5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FH5
E-520 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH5 over the Olympus E-520
FH5 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 28 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FH5
E-520 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 comes with physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH5 has measurements of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-520 against the FH5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecbb3/ecbb3117e03aa723a53444fe78c72eb805ea4351" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and FH5 is 68 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6012a/6012a9691f840dccb1555e3def262fd9a6bbf941" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and FH5.
Clearly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FH5 will give greater detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/212b0/212b00861588002365430ad72916b10d0c212f6e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/358d8/358d8bff0207c3da85be2687b6e896a8240e401b" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH5 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS18 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 121 gr (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | 260 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $169 |