Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a890/9a890f648d04f0d44b0ab60cf66dad92c5bf3b0f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-6.4) lens
- 123g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Overview
Following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FH8 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FH8 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was revealed 4 years before the FH8 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH8 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-520 grades against the FH8 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FH8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FH8
E-520 | FH8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH8 over the Olympus E-520
FH8 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 41 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FH8
E-520 | FH8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 provides external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH8 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 123 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-520 vs the FH8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fd46/9fd466e7b1efd9251672b0732c38c5d07922aae0" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and FH8 is 68 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40c25/40c25c6d668c91d8a5301509e64e6b19108d1940" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The image below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and FH8.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-520 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FH8 will render greater detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/607e3/607e3f8f3772f791516ad9328f14e3933b410755" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3348e/3348e89f347f18ca8cdd3d28326cf3a2945111dd" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FH8 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH8 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 4cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lb) | 123 grams (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 260 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $400 | $149 |