Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front
Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
10
Overall
23

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Panasonic FS42
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000 (Increase to 6400)
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
  • Announced April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FS42, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") use different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-520 was revealed 8 months before the FS42 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a short view of how the E-520 grades vs the FS42 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FS42

 E-520 FS42 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display sizing2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-520

 FS42 E-520 
AnnouncedApril 2009August 2008Fresher by 8 months

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FS42

 E-520 FS42 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 comes with exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-520 and the FS42.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and FS42 is 68 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and FS42.

Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact MP but different sensor sizing. The E-520 has got the larger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field simpler. The older E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography information
Panasonic FS42 Portrait photography information
59
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution low (10MP)
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography factors
Panasonic FS42 Street photography factors
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
47
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
no RAW format
low max ISO (1,000)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-520
Sports photography with Panasonic FS42
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
better than average battery power (650 shots)
supports phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
16
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
no phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-520
Travel photography with Panasonic FS42
52
better than average battery power (650 shots)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FS42 Landscape photography information
58
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (650 CIPA)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
22
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5 inches)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.5")
low max ISO (1,000)
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-520
Vlogging with Panasonic FS42
9
can't record video
22
wide angle not good (33mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FS42
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42
Type Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2008-08-20 2009-04-17
Body design Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1000
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-132mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 6.3
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.30 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552g (1.22 lbs) 132g (0.29 lbs)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $400 $580