Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 149g - 102 x 56 x 22mm
- Launched August 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the FX90 (12MP) is very similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FX90 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-520 was introduced 4 years earlier than the FX90 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX90 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-520 grades vs the FX90 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FX90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FX90
| E-520 | FX90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX90 over the Olympus E-520
| FX90 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2011 | August 2008 | Fresher by 36 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FX90
| E-520 | FX90 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 comes with external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Panasonic FX90 has dimensions of 102mm x 56mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-520 and the FX90.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and FX90 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and FX90.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic FX90 will offer you extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FX90 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX90 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2011-08-26 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lb) | 149 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 102 x 56 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 pictures | 200 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $227 |