Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ2500
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") feature different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-520 was released 9 years prior to the FZ2500 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-520 matches up versus the FZ2500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-520 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-520
FZ2500 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | August 2008 | Newer by 98 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-520 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 features exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has measurements of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") and a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-520 against the FZ2500.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and FZ2500 is 68 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over specs. The picture here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and FZ2500.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 915g (2.02 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 548 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 350 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $400 | $998 |