Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
68 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 493g - 120 x 81 x 92mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ62
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ60, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FZ60 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FZ60 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-520 was released 4 years prior to the FZ60 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ60 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-520 matches up vs the FZ60 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic FZ60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FZ60
E-520 | FZ60 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ60 over the Olympus E-520
FZ60 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2012 | August 2008 | Newer by 47 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ60
E-520 | FZ60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ60 has specifications of 120mm x 81mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") along with a weight of 493 grams (1.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ60 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-520 vs the FZ60.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and FZ60 is 68 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and FZ60.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ60 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FZ62 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 493g (1.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 120 x 81 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 450 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $400 | $350 |