Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60 front
Portability
68
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed August 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-510
Panasonic FZ60
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
  • 493g - 120 x 81 x 92mm
  • Revealed July 2012
  • Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ62
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Overview

The following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ60, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FZ60 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FZ60 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-520 was released 4 years prior to the FZ60 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ60 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-520 matches up vs the FZ60 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FZ60

 E-520 FZ60 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ60 over the Olympus E-520

 FZ60 E-520 
RevealedJuly 2012August 2008Newer by 47 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ60

 E-520 FZ60 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ60 has specifications of 120mm x 81mm x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6") along with a weight of 493 grams (1.09 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ60 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-520 vs the FZ60.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and FZ60 is 68 and 68 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and FZ60.

Clearly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ60 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography advice
Panasonic FZ60 Portrait photography advice
59
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
44
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-520
Street photography with Panasonic FZ60
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
44
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than average (493 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FZ60 as a Sports photography camera
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good battery life (650 shots)
comes with phase detect AF
max fps low (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10MP)
55
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (450 CIPA)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-520
Travel photography with Panasonic FZ60
52
good battery life (650 per charge)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
57
better than average battery pack (450 per charge)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (493 grams)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography info
Panasonic FZ60 Landscape photography info
58
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (650 shots)
small screen (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (10MP)
no Time Lapse mode
50
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
better than average battery pack (450 CIPA)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FZ60 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
27
pretty wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone port
more heavy than average (493g)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ60 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ60
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ60
Alternative name - Lumix DMC-FZ62
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2008-08-20 2012-07-18
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-5.2
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 202k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552g (1.22 lbs) 493g (1.09 lbs)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 120 x 81 x 92mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 shots 450 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $400 $350