Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
62
Overall
51

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Older Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic FZ80
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 616g - 130 x 94 x 119mm
  • Revealed January 2017
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ82
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 Overview

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and FZ80 (18MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and FZ80 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-520 was announced 9 years prior to the FZ80 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ80 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-520 scores versus the FZ80 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic FZ80

 E-520 FZ80 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ80 over the Olympus E-520

 FZ80 E-520 
RevealedJanuary 2017August 2008Fresher by 101 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ80

 E-520 FZ80 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 enjoys external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ80 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 119mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.7") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-520 vs the FZ80.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and FZ80 is 68 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and FZ80.

Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-520 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ80 will offer greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FZ80 Portrait photography highlights
59
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
low MP (10 megapixels)
58
you can focus manually
good resolution (18MP)
supports face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography features
Panasonic FZ80 Street photography features
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
54
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
has focus by touch
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (616g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FZ80 as a Sports photography camera
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
better than average battery pack (650 CIPA)
sensor has phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
low MP (10MP)
57
great zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18MP)
supports tracking focus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic FZ80 Travel photography highlights
52
better than average battery pack (650 per charge)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low MP (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
59
has focus by touch
good resolution (18MP)
built-in flash
decently wide (20mm)
great reach (1200mm)
more heavy than competitors (616g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography information
Panasonic FZ80 Landscape photography information
58
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
small screen (2.7 inches)
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
57
you can focus manually
decently wide (20mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18MP)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FZ80 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
28
decently wide (20mm)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competitors (616g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic FZ80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic FZ80
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80
Also called - Lumix DMC-FZ82
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2008-08-20 2017-01-04
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 3 49
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,166 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.46x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Highest quiet shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 14.10 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, 1st Curtain Sync, 2nd Curtain Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552g (1.22 lb) 616g (1.36 lb)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 130 x 94 x 119mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 images 330 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 images x 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $400 $399