Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 front
Portability
70
Imaging
51
Features
65
Overall
56

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Launched August 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-510
Panasonic GH2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 160 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 442g - 124 x 90 x 76mm
  • Announced March 2011
  • Superseded the Panasonic GH1
  • Newer Model is Panasonic GH3
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic GH2, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and GH2 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-520 was launched 3 years before the GH2 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GH2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-520 matches up against the GH2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic GH2

 E-520 GH2 

Reasons to pick Panasonic GH2 over the Olympus E-520

 GH2 E-520 
AnnouncedMarch 2011August 2008Newer by 31 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GH2

 E-520 GH2 
Focus manually More exact focusing

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has got external dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic GH2 has specifications of 124mm x 90mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0") with a weight of 442 grams (0.97 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic GH2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-520 against the GH2.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and GH2 is 68 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The image underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and GH2.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Panasonic GH2 to offer more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic GH2 as a Portrait photography camera
59
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
70
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography information
Panasonic GH2 Street photography information
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
68
screen can move to multiple angles
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic GH2 as a Sports photography camera
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great battery (650 CIPA)
has phase detect autofocus
low fps (4.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
46
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
terrible battery life (330 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography info
Panasonic GH2 Travel photography info
52
great battery (650 shots)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
62
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery life (330 per charge)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
Landscape photography with Panasonic GH2
58
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
great battery (650 per charge)
small screen (2.7")
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
60
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no image stabilization
terrible battery life (330 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging factors
Panasonic GH2 Vlogging factors
9
no video shooting
71
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
includes face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with mic port
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GH2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GH2
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
Type Entry-Level DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2008-08-20 2011-03-23
Body design Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 160
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.71x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 15.60 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (24, 30, 60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552 grams (1.22 lbs) 442 grams (0.97 lbs)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 124 x 90 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 60
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 21.2
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 11.3
DXO Low light rating 548 655
Other
Battery life 650 photos 330 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $400 $1,000