Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1

Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
53
Features
60
Overall
55

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed August 2008
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-510
Panasonic GM1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 204g - 99 x 55 x 30mm
  • Revealed December 2013
  • Refreshed by Panasonic GM5
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Overview

On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and GM1 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-520 was introduced 6 years before the GM1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-520 grades vs the GM1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic GM1

 E-520 GM1 

Reasons to pick Panasonic GM1 over the Olympus E-520

 GM1 E-520 
RevealedDecember 2013August 2008More modern by 64 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1036k230kSharper screen (+806k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GM1

 E-520 GM1 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 features outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GM1 has proportions of 99mm x 55mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-520 compared to the GM1.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and GM1 is 68 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specifications. The image underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and GM1.

To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Panasonic GM1 to provide more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic GM1 Portrait photography highlights
58
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
65
focusing manually
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
no external flash support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography highlights
Panasonic GM1 Street photography highlights
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
77
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has touch focus
lighter than average in class (204 grams)
great high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography advice
Panasonic GM1 Sports photography advice
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
better than average battery (650 shots)
comes with phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
48
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
low max shutter speed (1/500s)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
bad battery (230 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography highlights
Panasonic GM1 Travel photography highlights
52
better than average battery (650 CIPA)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
74
lighter than average in class (204 grams)
has touch focus
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
bad battery (230 CIPA)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic GM1 Landscape photography factors
57
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (650 per charge)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
69
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
no image stabilization
bad battery (230 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging advice
Panasonic GM1 Vlogging advice
9
can't shoot video
35
screen is touchscreen
includes face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (204g)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
doesn't have external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GM1
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2008-08-20 2013-12-19
Physical type Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4592 x 3448
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 107
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dots 1,036k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/500s
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/16000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s 1/50s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 24p), 1280 x 720p (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552g (1.22 lbs) 204g (0.45 lbs)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 99 x 55 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 66
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 22.3
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 11.7
DXO Low light score 548 660
Other
Battery life 650 pictures 230 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $400 $750