Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
93 Imaging
53 Features
60 Overall
55
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 204g - 99 x 55 x 30mm
- Revealed December 2013
- Refreshed by Panasonic GM5
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and GM1 (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-520 was introduced 6 years before the GM1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-520 grades vs the GM1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic GM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic GM1
E-520 | GM1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GM1 over the Olympus E-520
GM1 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2013 | August 2008 | More modern by 64 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1036k | 230k | Sharper screen (+806k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GM1
E-520 | GM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 features outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GM1 has proportions of 99mm x 55mm x 30mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") having a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-520 compared to the GM1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and GM1 is 68 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing specifications. The image underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and GM1.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Panasonic GM1 to provide more detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GM1 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2013-12-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,036k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/500s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/50s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 24p), 1280 x 720p (60p, 50p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 204g (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 99 x 55 x 30mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | 548 | 660 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 230 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $400 | $750 |