Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
87 Imaging
52 Features
54 Overall
52
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 318g - 116 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2012
- Newer Model is Panasonic GX7
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and GX1 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-520 was brought out 4 years before the GX1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic GX1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-520 scores versus the GX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Panasonic GX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic GX1
E-520 | GX1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX1 over the Olympus E-520
GX1 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | August 2008 | More modern by 42 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic GX1
E-520 | GX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 provides outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX1 has proportions of 116mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 318 grams (0.70 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-520 and the GX1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and GX1 is 68 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The picture below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and GX1.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Panasonic GX1 to deliver extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic GX1 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2012-02-14 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 pounds) | 318g (0.70 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 116 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 10.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | 703 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $400 | $228 |