Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/412c5/412c547ac6ea230796d84fdf7002bf3eb9374bca" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
29 Overall
33
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 112g - 98 x 57 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and S2 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and S2 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was introduced 4 years prior to the S2 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic S2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-520 scores vs the S2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Panasonic S2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic S2
E-520 | S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S2 over the Olympus E-520
S2 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2012 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 41 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic S2
E-520 | S2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 provides exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Panasonic S2 has measurements of 98mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 112 grams (0.25 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-520 versus the S2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de37b/de37bf92f32465877140bd4115e2a80cfb3765a7" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and S2 is 68 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76058/7605845f438ebfc8af9f1016455264ec8a47eaaa" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and S2.
All in all, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-520 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic S2 will resolve extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e92f/7e92f4e945008456feb05b12b1009b9276bad53f" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3105/e310535c0449f41cce79e1d2fd3e5ad401ba0109" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic S2 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S2 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2012-01-09 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 pounds) | 112g (0.25 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 98 x 57 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 280 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $109 |