Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02196/021961aeeda224be9ea001af3857cff545e9e689" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ8 front"
94 Imaging
40 Features
31 Overall
36
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 159g - 100 x 60 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic SZ8, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and SZ8 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and SZ8 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-520 was launched 6 years before the SZ8 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic SZ8 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-520 scores versus the SZ8 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ8. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic SZ8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic SZ8
E-520 | SZ8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic SZ8 over the Olympus E-520
SZ8 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 65 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic SZ8
E-520 | SZ8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 comes with outer measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic SZ8 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic SZ8 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-520 compared to the SZ8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bead/0beadc7f235c3c98cce698c187545a1650e7f46e" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and SZ8 is 68 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d54de/d54debb835237816d4e6406e6c3c7bbec4f210ab" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and SZ8.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-520 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic SZ8 will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a02bf/a02bfdd3b7c9c78f0c7de995d08e1ba66b881b57" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ebcc/5ebccb486dcf947544bb99e0e4e53e20d717e5a9" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic SZ8 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-SZ8 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.3 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p), 320 x 240 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 100 x 60 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | 200 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $400 | $275 |