Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46f23/46f23a815660bb4b9a3063ec06850b50f1e75859" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 front"
93 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FT10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and TS10 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and TS10 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-520 was released 17 months earlier than the TS10 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic TS10 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-520 scores against the TS10 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic TS10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic TS10
E-520 | TS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS10 over the Olympus E-520
TS10 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2010 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 17 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic TS10
E-520 | TS10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 enjoys outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic TS10 has specifications of 99mm x 63mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-520 against the TS10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfcfc/cfcfccc15c9cea0f72272610c36b11aad0f6a640" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and TS10 is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25bed/25bedf732e3ccd9d509906b2b2c69f319afca89d" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The picture here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and TS10.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-520 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic TS10 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0961e/0961e936cbdb7dfef25211b8946eaf0c41df469a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7f9/ac7f94f978f55813a361f0ceaa044d3f233c9b22" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic TS10 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FT10 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2010-01-21 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) | 188 gr (0.41 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $400 | $249 |