Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58335/5833596ee00df61640e59d2c257f4e05c3bd6638" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Launched June 2012
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Updated by Panasonic ZS20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS15, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the ZS15 (12MP) is very similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS15 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-520 was released 4 years prior to the ZS15 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS15 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-520 grades versus the ZS15 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS15
E-520 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus E-520
ZS15 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2012 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 46 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS15
E-520 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has got outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS15 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS15 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-520 compared to the ZS15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e3a1/9e3a12d2f9f822e1acc66bfadea1b7f8a6f2c1b6" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and ZS15 is 68 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54ee8/54ee892e8b77ed763fb29af355866627b7469298" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and ZS15.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS15 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/facd8/facd830ecca3e821bb7fb3040878a63a41aedd88" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69104/6910472db701e029dcdef06aed0015d64f4e3fe2" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2012-06-29 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lbs) | 208 grams (0.46 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 images | 260 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $400 | $279 |