Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed August 2008
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Released January 2014
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
  • Refreshed by Panasonic ZS40
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic ZS35, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-520 was revealed 6 years prior to the ZS35 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-520 grades against the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS35

 E-520 ZS35 
Manually focus Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-520

 ZS35 E-520 
ReleasedJanuary 2014August 2008More recent by 65 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS35

 E-520 ZS35 
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 features physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has proportions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-520 compared to the ZS35.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and ZS35 is 68 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and ZS35.

As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will give greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography information
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography information
59
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
exports RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
37
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
provides face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Street photography camera
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
68
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (305 grams)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Sports photography camera
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great battery power (650 CIPA)
comes with phase detect AF
low fps (4.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
53
long zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-520
Travel photography with Panasonic ZS35
52
great battery power (650 CIPA)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
68
lighter than competition in class (305g)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (480mm)
missing Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-520
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS35
58
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
great battery power (650 shots)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
44
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-520
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS35
9
lack of video recording
34
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (305g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2008-08-20 2014-01-06
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Max enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 21
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552 gr (1.22 lbs) 305 gr (0.67 lbs)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $400 $300