Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Previous Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic ZS35, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-520 was revealed 6 years prior to the ZS35 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-520 grades against the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-520 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-520
ZS35 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | August 2008 | More recent by 65 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS35
E-520 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 features physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS35 has proportions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-520 compared to the ZS35.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and ZS35 is 68 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and ZS35.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will give greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $400 | $300 |