Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed August 2008
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-510
Panasonic ZS45
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 249g - 108 x 60 x 32mm
  • Released January 2015
  • Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ57
  • Previous Model is Panasonic ZS40
  • Replacement is Panasonic ZS50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 Overview

The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and ZS45 (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS45 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-520 was released 7 years earlier than the ZS45 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS45 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-520 matches up against the ZS45 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS45

 E-520 ZS45 
Manual focus Very precise focusing

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS45 over the Olympus E-520

 ZS45 E-520 
ReleasedJanuary 2015August 2008Newer by 77 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS45

 E-520 ZS45 
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 offers outside dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS45 has proportions of 108mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-520 versus the ZS45.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and ZS45 is 68 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and ZS45.

As you have seen, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 because of its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic ZS45 will show more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS45
59
you can focus manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
37
decent MP (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography advice
Panasonic ZS45 Street photography advice
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
69
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (249 grams)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography features
Panasonic ZS45 Sports photography features
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good battery life (650 shots)
comes with phase detect autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
55
excellent zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
good battery power (350 CIPA)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography factors
Panasonic ZS45 Travel photography factors
52
good battery life (650 per charge)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
71
good battery power (350 CIPA)
lighter than competition (249g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
great zoom (480mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic ZS45 as a Landscape photography camera
58
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
good battery life (650 CIPA)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
no Time Lapse recording
47
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
good battery power (350 shots)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
does not have Time Lapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging factors
Panasonic ZS45 Vlogging factors
9
can't shoot video
34
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (249 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS45 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS45
 Olympus E-520Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-520 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS45
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-TZ57
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2008-08-20 2015-01-06
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 21
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,040k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552 gr (1.22 lb) 249 gr (0.55 lb)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 108 x 60 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 photos 350 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $400 $300