Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3489a/3489af051e3f1e96e94ebc3ad8548328466cc9bf" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
39 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 210g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Launched July 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ18
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic ZS8, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and ZS8 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and ZS8 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-520 was released 3 years prior to the ZS8 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS8 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-520 grades vs the ZS8 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Panasonic ZS8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Panasonic ZS8
E-520 | ZS8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS8 over the Olympus E-520
ZS8 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | August 2008 | More modern by 35 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Panasonic ZS8
E-520 | ZS8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 features outside measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS8 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 versus Panasonic ZS8 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-520 against the ZS8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90d21/90d2110853c7021828e7f853da233d63f7507516" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and ZS8 is 68 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ebffc/ebffc0b1228a61ce6aeee8b06593229fedcfb2b4" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The image below will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and ZS8.
All in all, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-520 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS8 will render extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f105e/f105e4656154091f6d3b7ba0786cf967f7e2e7c7" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdf92/bdf92a89ffa69d2eedb49982b43f9553ec3ef7b1" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Panasonic ZS8 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ18 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 210 grams (0.46 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 340 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $400 | $275 |