Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa135/aa1355992173e4aa3e49b43ef3ec8d4d72dcf8b1" alt="Pentax K-1 front Pentax K-1 front"
55 Imaging
75 Features
82 Overall
77
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replacement is Pentax K-1 II
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Overview
Below is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax K-1, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and K-1 (36MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and K-1 (Full frame) offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-520 was announced 8 years before the K-1 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax K-1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-520 matches up against the K-1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 and Pentax K-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Pentax K-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax K-1
E-520 | K-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 over the Olympus E-520
K-1 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | August 2008 | More recent by 91 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax K-1
E-520 | K-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 features physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Pentax K-1 has specifications of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") along with a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
See the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax K-1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-520 against the K-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2867b/2867bb77b685af4586535bfba5a48fb0734c4d66" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and K-1 is 68 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24753/247538d6b9148665c799542a410ebd7e43d5344c" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and K-1.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-520 with its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Pentax K-1 will deliver more detail with its extra 26MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7b0b/e7b0b2e204de04ab7d0e14c1db6f32a1e374cea5" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caa3d/caa3dc70aedde32804321ff36a7c42b7a0e7a05b" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax K-1 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Pentax K-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Pentax K-1 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2016-02-17 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 36 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 33 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 45 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.2 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 4.4 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 lb) | 1010g (2.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | 96 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 25.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 14.6 |
DXO Low light score | 548 | 3280 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photos | 760 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Retail cost | $400 | $1,499 |