Olympus E-520 vs Pentax MX-1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
 
               
              84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Introduced August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        Olympus E-520 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Here is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-520 and Pentax MX-1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor size.
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossaryThe E-520 was launched 5 years earlier than the MX-1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-520 scores versus the MX-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        Olympus E-520 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Pentax MX-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax MX-1
| E-520 | MX-1 | 
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-520
| MX-1 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | August 2008 | Fresher by 59 months | 
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen | 
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | 
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | 
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax MX-1
| E-520 | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen | 
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 comes with outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Pentax MX-1 has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 and Pentax MX-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-520 vs the MX-1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and MX-1 is 68 and 84 respectively.
 
          Olympus E-520 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through specifications. The visual underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and MX-1.
To sum up, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Pentax MX-1 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
 
          Olympus E-520 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
        
                
        Olympus E-520 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Pentax MX-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax | 
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Pentax MX-1 | 
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact | 
| Introduced | 2008-08-20 | 2013-07-01 | 
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" | 
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 | 
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 | 
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 | 
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 25 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens | 
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 
| Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 | 
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm | 
| Total lenses | 45 | - | 
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting | 
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" | 
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD with AR coating | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None | 
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - | 
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - | 
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds | 
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds | 
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes | 
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m | 
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 | 
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 | 
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 391 grams (0.86 pounds) | 
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | 49 | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 20.4 | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 11.3 | 
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | 208 | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 images | 290 images | 
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack | 
| Battery ID | - | D-Li-106 | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | 
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 | 
| Cost at release | $400 | $400 | 



