Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f030/9f03013b4b6e229689ea100f87aa37abcbac60f6" alt="Pentax Optio WG-1 front Pentax Optio WG-1 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and WG-1 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and WG-1 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-520 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the WG-1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-520 grades against the WG-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Pentax Optio WG-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax WG-1
E-520 | WG-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus E-520
WG-1 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax WG-1
E-520 | WG-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 provides outer dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-520 vs the WG-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48cd0/48cd0276c34a428706936e1e14d4490456f71b31" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and WG-1 is 68 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2420/d2420c067a47cb435e2bc6b25406bdd7363af9d3" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by researching specs. The graphic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and WG-1.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-1 will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2400f/2400ff3c2d6e563db2fcc6ccf8c647eddb4d0138" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a491d/a491d6363745d5149bf66307b8c8789f684abb1b" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2011-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 157 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 260 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $400 | $350 |