Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q10
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
92 Imaging
36 Features
56 Overall
44
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q10 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax Q10, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the Q10 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and Q10 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-520 was released 5 years before the Q10 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax Q10 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-520 matches up vs the Q10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Pentax Q10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Pentax Q10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax Q10
| E-520 | Q10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q10 over the Olympus E-520
| Q10 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2012 | August 2008 | More recent by 49 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax Q10
| E-520 | Q10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q10 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 has got physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Pentax Q10 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 versus Pentax Q10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-520 vs the Q10.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and Q10 is 68 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and Q10.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Pentax Q10 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q10 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Pentax Q10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Pentax Q10 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2012-09-10 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
| Available lenses | 45 | 8 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 7.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552 gr (1.22 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 21.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 10.9 |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | 183 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 images | 270 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $350 |