Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47cc3/47cc36294b4f1e966fa0339cbc53fca25058b3e6" alt="Olympus E-520 front Olympus E-520 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff182/ff18240782b3e81fef5b6699b11da2b99c864ba8" alt="Pentax Q7 front Pentax Q7 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Replaced the Pentax Q10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the Q7 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and Q7 (1/1.7") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-520 was introduced 6 years before the Q7 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-520 grades versus the Q7 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 and Pentax Q7. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax Q7
E-520 | Q7 |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Olympus E-520
Q7 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | ![]() | August 2008 | Newer by 60 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax Q7
E-520 | Q7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-520 offers physical measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") and a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Pentax Q7 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 vs the Q7.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f608d/f608d001513610443412c2a7a0163130048fbb3a" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and Q7 is 68 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c041/3c041e802f10e3a328c0dd225b6875d5b682cb64" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The picture below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and Q7.
As you have seen, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Pentax Q7 will give extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f523/6f52371fa5918eec40b62d0b2d987d0c27ec3ed2" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12b71/12b71c91e86bb212ca50a64e70989f1ab27e86e5" alt="Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Pentax Q7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-520 | Pentax Q7 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2008-08-20 | 2013-08-08 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Number of lenses | 45 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 pounds) | 200g (0.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | 250 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $400 | $480 |