Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 238g - 125 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed July 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and WG-3 GPS (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and WG-3 GPS (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-520 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-3 GPS which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-3 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the E-520 matches up vs the WG-3 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-520 and Pentax WG-3 GPS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Pentax WG-3 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Pentax WG-3 GPS
| E-520 | WG-3 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 GPS over the Olympus E-520
| WG-3 GPS | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2013 | August 2008 | More modern by 59 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Pentax WG-3 GPS
| E-520 | WG-3 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 enjoys physical dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 GPS has proportions of 125mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 238 grams (0.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-520 and the WG-3 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and WG-3 GPS is 68 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and WG-3 GPS.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-520 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Pentax WG-3 GPS will give greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-520 vs Pentax WG-3 GPS Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Pentax WG-3 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus E-520 | Pentax WG-3 GPS |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Released | 2008-08-20 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 552g (1.22 lbs) | 238g (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 125 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 shots | 240 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $400 | $350 |