Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44


93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-520 versus Ricoh CX2, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is fairly comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

The E-520 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the CX2 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-520 scores versus the CX2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Ricoh CX2
E-520 | CX2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-520
CX2 | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2009 | ![]() | August 2008 | Fresher by 12 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Ricoh CX2
E-520 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has got exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-520 versus Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 compared to the CX2.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and CX2 is 68 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and CX2.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-520 will show more detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus E-520 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-520 | Ricoh CX2 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2008-08-20 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 552g (1.22 pounds) | 185g (0.41 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 548 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $400 | $341 |