Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44
Olympus E-520 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Released August 2008
  • Replaced the Olympus E-510
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced August 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-520 versus Ricoh CX2, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is fairly comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-520 was unveiled 12 months earlier than the CX2 which means that they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-520 scores versus the CX2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Ricoh CX2

 E-520 CX2 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-520

 CX2 E-520 
IntroducedAugust 2009August 2008Fresher by 12 months
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Ricoh CX2

 E-520 CX2 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has got exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-520 versus Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 compared to the CX2.

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and CX2 is 68 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The visual below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and CX2.

Plainly, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-520 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-520 will show more detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-520
Portrait photography with Ricoh CX2
58
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW files
low resolution (10MP)
25
you can focus manually
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography advice
Ricoh CX2 Street photography advice
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
fixed screen
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185 grams)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Sports photography camera
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
comes with phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
low resolution (10MP)
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (9MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Travel photography camera
52
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
low resolution (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
lighter than average (185 grams)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
great reach (300mm)
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography factors
57
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (650 shots)
small screen (2.7 inch)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse function
42
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor resolution low (9 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging details
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging details
9
no video recording
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (185 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus E-520Ricoh CX2
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-520 Ricoh CX2
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2008-08-20 2009-08-20
Body design Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552g (1.22 pounds) 185g (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 shots -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID - DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $400 $341