Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Announced August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and WG-20 (14MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and WG-20 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-520 was announced 6 years prior to the WG-20 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-520 scores against the WG-20 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-520 and Ricoh WG-20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery and Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Ricoh WG-20
| E-520 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Olympus E-520
| WG-20 | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | August 2008 | Newer by 66 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Ricoh WG-20
| E-520 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 enjoys external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-520 against the WG-20.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and WG-20 is 68 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The picture here should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-520 and WG-20.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Ricoh WG-20 will give extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-520 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2008-08-20 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552 grams (1.22 lb) | 164 grams (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $370 |