Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-30W
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Old Model is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-520 and Ricoh WG-30W, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and WG-30W (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and WG-30W (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-520 was manufactured 7 years prior to the WG-30W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-520 matches up against the WG-30W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-520 & Ricoh WG-30W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| E-520 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus E-520
| WG-30W | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2014 | August 2008 | Newer by 74 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Ricoh WG-30W
| E-520 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-520 has exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-520 and Ricoh WG-30W in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-520 vs the WG-30W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and WG-30W is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The picture below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-520 and WG-30W.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Ricoh WG-30W will provide more detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-520 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2008-08-20 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552 gr (1.22 lbs) | 194 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photos | 300 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $400 | $280 |