Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M

Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44
Olympus E-520 front
 
Samsung NX300M front
Portability
86
Imaging
62
Features
73
Overall
66

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Introduced August 2008
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-510
Samsung NX300M
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M Overview

Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and NX300M (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-520 was introduced 5 years prior to the NX300M which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the E-520 scores against the NX300M when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Samsung NX300M

 E-520 NX300M 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus E-520

 NX300M E-520 
IntroducedJanuary 2013August 2008Newer by 53 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3.3"2.7"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution768k230kClearer display (+538k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Samsung NX300M

 E-520 NX300M 
Manually focus More exact focus
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 features exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Samsung NX300M has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 and the NX300M.

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and NX300M is 68 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and NX300M.

Clearly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-520 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX300M will show more detail using its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged E-520 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography information
Samsung NX300M Portrait photography information
58
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
exports RAW files
MP count low (10MP)
77
focusing manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Street photography camera
Samsung NX300M as a Street photography camera
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
80
screen tilts
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
boasts focus via touch
above average high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung NX300M as a Sports photography camera
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
better than average battery power (650 per charge)
has phase detect AF
low fps (4.0 frames per second)
MP count low (10MP)
72
high shutter speed (1/6,000s)
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect autofocus
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography details
Samsung NX300M Travel photography details
52
better than average battery power (650 shots)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
66
boasts focus via touch
MP count good (20 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography information
Samsung NX300M Landscape photography information
57
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (650 CIPA)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
MP count low (10MP)
missing Timelapse recording
72
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Samsung NX mount)
pretty good screen size (3.3 inch)
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-520
Vlogging with Samsung NX300M
9
lack of video recording
33
touchscreen capability
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-520 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Samsung NX300M
 Olympus E-520Samsung NX300M
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-520 Samsung NX300M
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2008-08-20 2013-01-03
Physical type Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - DRIMe IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 247
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Amount of lenses 45 32
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.7" 3.3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 768 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames/s 9.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552 gr (1.22 lbs) 331 gr (0.73 lbs)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 pictures 330 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $400 $699