Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
68
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Older Model is Olympus E-510
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Here is a detailed review of the Olympus E-520 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-520 was released 6 years prior to the DP2 Quattro and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-520 grades versus the DP2 Quattro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-520 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus E-520

 DP2 Quattro E-520 
IntroducedFebruary 2014August 2008Fresher by 66 months
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 E-520 DP2 Quattro 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-520 has got external measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Olympus E-520 versus Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-520 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-520 and DP2 Quattro is 68 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-520 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can see, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-520 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-520 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
58
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW formats
low MP (10MP)
77
manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features face detection focus
saves RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography details
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
61
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography features
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good battery power (650 per charge)
supports phase detect auto focus
low frames per second (4.0 frames per second)
low MP (10MP)
47
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography highlights
52
good battery power (650 CIPA)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low MP (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
53
good MP (20 megapixels)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography advice
57
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (650 per charge)
small screen (2.7 inch)
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
59
manual focus
screen size is good (3 inches)
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 Vlogging factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging factors
9
can't shoot video
9
no video shooting
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-520 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus E-520Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus E-520 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Class Entry-Level DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2008-08-20 2014-02-13
Physical type Compact SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 45mm (1x)
Max aperture - f/2.8
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Maximum video resolution None None
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 552g (1.22 lb) 395g (0.87 lb)
Dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 548 not tested
Other
Battery life 650 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $400 $931