Clicky

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230

Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45
Olympus E-520 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Announced August 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-510
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Superseded the Sony A200
  • New Model is Sony A290
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 Overview

Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-520 (10MP) and the A230 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-520 (Four Thirds) and A230 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizes.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The E-520 was manufactured 9 months before the A230 so they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-520 matches up against the A230 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony A230

 E-520 A230 

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Olympus E-520

 A230 E-520 
LaunchedMay 2009August 2008More modern by 9 months

Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony A230

 E-520 A230 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-520 has exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Sony A230 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") with a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-520 against the A230.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-520 and A230 is 68 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and A230.

As you can see, both cameras come with the identical resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-520 contains the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field harder. The more aged E-520 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-520 Portrait photography info
Sony A230 Portrait photography info
59
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
54
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-520 Street photography highlights
Sony A230 Street photography highlights
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-520 Sports photography factors
Sony A230 Sports photography factors
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great battery power (650 shots)
has phase detect autofocus
low fps (4.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (10MP)
46
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
low battery life (230 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-520 Travel photography highlights
Sony A230 Travel photography highlights
52
great battery power (650 per charge)
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
45
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
low battery life (230 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-520 Landscape photography info
Sony A230 Landscape photography info
58
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
great battery power (650 shots)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (10MP)
does not have Time Lapse recording
51
has manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
low battery life (230 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-520 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A230 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video shooting
9
lack of video recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-520 vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-520 and Sony A230
 Olympus E-520Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-520 Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2008-08-20 2009-05-18
Physical type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.55x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Maximum video resolution None None
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 552g (1.22 lb) 490g (1.08 lb)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 63
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 22.3
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 11.4
DXO Low light score 548 531
Other
Battery life 650 photos 230 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots One One
Launch cost $400 $569