Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-3N
68 Imaging
44 Features
45 Overall
44
89 Imaging
56 Features
52 Overall
54
Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Released August 2008
- Replaced the Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Succeeded the Sony NEX-F3
- Successor is Sony a5000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-520 versus Sony NEX-3N, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-520 (10MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-520 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-520 was announced 5 years before the NEX-3N and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the E-520 grades against the NEX-3N in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-520 & Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-520 Gallery & Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Sony NEX-3N
| E-520 | NEX-3N |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-520
| NEX-3N | E-520 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 | August 2008 | Fresher by 55 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-520 and Sony NEX-3N
| E-520 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-520 has exterior dimensions of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-520 versus Sony NEX-3N in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-520 versus the NEX-3N.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-520 and NEX-3N is 68 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-520 and NEX-3N.
As you can see, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-520 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony NEX-3N will provide you with greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-520 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-520 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Olympus E-520 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-520 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2008-08-20 | 2013-02-25 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 45 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 552 grams (1.22 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 548 | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photos | 480 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $400 | $399 |